'Small Things Like These': comparative modes
A summary of notes on the 4 comparative modes and how they might apply to Claire Keegan’s Small Things Like These. Lots of course overlap.
Also in this series:
I will be giving a free webinar on the book for English teachers on the evening of Tuesday 10th September 2024: register
THEMES
Responsibility and provision; duty.
Personal blindness, self-realisation and personal development. And the parallel blindness of Irish society.
Conscience, integrity, individual self. Moral dilemmas, ethics.
The fragility of life.
The influences of and shaping by childhood.
The power of economics in shaping individual lives.
Time.
The influence of the past.
Religion (morality, marriage): see Cultural Context.
Furlong’s journey (‘wherever you want to go, son’). Doorways. Think of Robert Frost’s ‘The Road Not Taken’.
Yearning, escape (both Furlong and the girls).
Beliefs, faith; where personal values clash with religious doctrine.
Complicity.
Family; parenting.
The search for Identity (reflections) - alternative versions of life. The shaping of character. Furlong’s mother could have been in the convent.
[All elements of Cultural Context can open up theme too].
CULTURAL CONTEXT
Gender - treatment of women (see Mrs Kehoe’s remark). The Virgin Mary (p.15) ‘kneeling passively’.
Class attitudes.
An obsession with transgressive sexuality. The ‘fallen’ women, the ‘shame’ of illegitimate birth.
Treatment of children. Illegitimate children do not ‘matter’ as much as ones born from a marriage - ‘common’.
The family, and those excluded from that norm.
And do some women internalise/enable this treatment?
Roman Catholic Church: a power-structure, hierarchy (‘all the one’ - Mrs Kehoe). The convent, the priests, the schools (Furlong was spat on and called ‘a name’; his daughters have only the one ‘good’ school to go to). The power-struggle of the (superficially civil) encounter with the Mother Superior. Pre-divorce, contraception, abortion.
Class attitudes (the Protestant Mrs Wilson).
1985: economic problems, closing businesses (Albatros, Graves & Co etc). Even the supposedly secure Furlongs need to be careful. A constrained world. Mick Synnott’s foraging son.
A close-knit community, at times oppressively so (can be censorious). And this can make a family like the Furlongs all the more vulnerable.
Monoculture in terms of religion, race, language (the rare Polish and Russian foreign visitors). Very insular.
Conformity.
The impact of this culture on individual lives. How would lives be different now?
The moving statues 1985: see the first 5 minutes of the relevant episode of Reeling in the Years.
GENERAL VISION AND VIEWPOINT
The overal context: recession, emigration, people everywhere struggling.
The grim oppressive power-structure of the Roman Catholic Church.
Treatment of children.
Furlong’s decency (like Kinsella in Foster).
But also, the joy of family life (is this threatened for Furlong at the end?).
The end: is trouble ahead? Do we admire him? Is he ‘foolish’?
The River: the dark undertow, Furlong’s journey.
Reflections (windows, mirrors).
Fracturing: ‘a part of him’, the jigsaw. Is he made whole by the end?
Doors, windows, locks.
LITERARY GENRE (not examined in 2025).
Understated style; a spare style with moments of greater elaboration.
Opening up big issues in the particular.
The subtlety of many details (the ‘hurried-looking hand’ from the Mother Superior on the card containing money, revealing how cynical the ‘gift’ was - a bribe)
The withholding of information, particularly Furlong’s father. The scarcely-noticeable seeds Keegan drops every now and then about Ned.
Primarily a linear structure, but Furlong’s past story is gradually revealed, woven into the present.
Use of motifs (doors, windows, mirrors, particular grammatical constructions).
Use of imagery, particular symbolism (overlaps with motifs).
‘Escalations’: key moments which push on the story - see the post on George Saunders.
3rd person narrative which comes out of Furlong’s consciousness.
Rich use of local detail and atmosphere to evoke New Ross in 1980s.
The end: as with Foster, there is an after-story for us to imagine.